Those Backwards Neo-Classicalists :: Neo-Classicalism Capitalism Capitalist Essays

Those Backwards Neo-Classicalists ace of the steer themes of our class was that Neo-Classicalism is wrong, not only wrong but backward. It seemed that everywhere we turned we found genius example after another that back up this conclusion. In a nutshell Neo-Classicalists believe that Capitalism is completely fair and that in a Capitalist system one can never be cheated. This erroneous theory extends even into the environment and pollution. The movie Erin Brockovich does a wonderful job of illustrating just how wrong the Neo-Classicalists are when it comes to this particular subject.Just what is the Neo-classical mental picture ab step to the fore the environment and pollution? Interestingly enough they do rent that companies pollute, they also admit that pollution should not be left untended. both of these admissions are actually surprising and somewhat contradictory to what one dexterity expect from the Neo-Classicalist, unfortunately this is as far as the surprise goes. In typical Neo-classical style the theory is that if pollution is really a job the foodstuff will bear this out and then resolve it. The whimsy is that the citizens will recognize that it is in the interest of the common good to hold the line pollution, and the response will be a non-political way of alleviating or filet the problem. I emphasize that the solution will be a non-political one because it appears that politics and Neo-classicalism are enemies. Neo-Classicalists believe that administration should never get winding in economic problems. They feel that if the government would just stay out of it all problems would solve themselves through neo-classicalism. In other words Government is just this terrible thing that imposes itself and mucks the whole system up The high-flown of Neo-classicalism is that the pollution problem will give rise to a market that will meet the demand for a clean environment. Which brings me to another principal of Neo-Classicalism with which I sire a problem all things should be nonrecreational for. The all-popular Brita pissing purifier and the increasingly popular atomic number 8 bars are set up examples of this ideal. Although you may be able to make an argument for this principal when it comes to goods and go it seems ludicrous when you apply it to the environment. You want clean air? Pay for an oxygen bar You want clean water? Buy yourself a water purifier Clean air and water should be things that all humans have a right to without having to pay for them.