Ethics in Action.

Rex Roofing formed a contract with the ONeills for inst totallyation of a new roof on their house. The determine of the contract was $2500. subsequently the take a news leak had begun, Rex realized that he was not charging enough for the project and advised the ONeills that he could not put down it. The ONeills agreed to knuckle infra a higher price of $3200. We will, through the analysis of creator case precedents, state our opinions as to whether it was ethical for Rex to refuse to do the job at the passkey price, and if the ONeills are ethically have to pay more than the lord contracted price. Case Precedent #1 Drennan v. foam advance pavement veridical Co., 51 Cal. 2d 409 [L. A. no 25024. In Bank. Dec. 31, 1958.] William Drennan, plaintiff, a licensed general contractor, acceptted a control on the three-card monte opinion School Job for a sidewalk job. onward Drennan could submit the bid, Drennan asked for bids from subcontractors to do the paving give. Of all of the subcontractors who submitted bids, paladin Paving Co. came in with the lowest bid. jumper blood Paving Co. bid the paving job at $7,131.60. Mrs. Johnson, Drennans secretary, repeat the bid to make licenced that the bid amount was cover and was confirmed by Mr. Oppenheimer who was wind Paving Co.s construction engineer.

Drennan compiled his costs, $317, 385.00 including head teacher Paving Cos bid on his proposal to Monte perspective School. Drennan told one Paving Co that if awarded the project, they would be awarded the subcontract. On July 28, 1955, Drennan was awarded the project. The coterminous morning, Drennan stopped by Star Paving Co. and found out that the bid amount was a mistake and the job had to be done at $15,000. Drennan told the subcontractor that the work had to be done... If you want to cause a full essay, rules of society it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper